From Barflies to Bitcoin: How Words Map Our Modern Era

Cover of From Barflies to Bitcoin: How Words Map Our Modern Era

by David Wilton, cover and illustrations by Ania Wilton

Did you know that the word musher, meaning a person who travels the Arctic by dog sled, makes its English language debut in 1900, at the height of the Klondike gold rush? And in the 2010s people were engaging in a different kind of treasure hunt by swiping right and inviting someone over to Netflix and chill? The words that enter the language in any given year can be a key to the zeitgeist[*]of the era.

From Barflies to Bitcoin: How Words Map Our Modern Era[†] is a linguistic treasure hunt of sorts, examining each year of the twentieth century, plus the opening decades of the twenty-first, for the neologisms that make their appearance during them. In so doing, the book provides a chronological history of the period through the words that were coined during it. For example, here are some words that appear in various years:

1901: dognapper, jai alai, motorism, Ms, pizzeria, pointillism

1950: aqualung, brainwashing, LSD, microfiche, Orwellian, Scrabble

2001: Blu-ray, bromance, CRISPR, Homeland Security, iPod, sext

Word lovers will enjoy combing through it for odd terms or words that appear surprisingly early or late, while history buffs will see events unfold before them, and looking up the particular years that the reader has lived through will evoke feelings of nostalgia and bring to mind the fads and fashions of that earlier era.

The book is written for the general reader in an accessible style, organized into short, annual sections that make it appropriate reading for a commute. Yet it is meticulously researched, with a notes section and bibliography at the end will provide references for those readers who want to follow up on the research. The primary reference is the Oxford English Dictionary, and I used the online version of that dictionary to assemble the preliminary lists of words for each year. I then went on to other reference works, such as Green’s Dictionary of Slang, the “Among the New Words” column of American Speech, and other sources to see where antedatings are available and modified the lists accordingly. The selection of words to represent each year is subjective, based on how they represent historical and cultural trends, whether they appear surprisingly early or late, or whether they are simply odd and interesting in and of themselves.

From Barflies to Bitcoin is available from Amazon.com.

 

[*] English borrowed Zeitgeist, literally “spirit of the times,” from German in 1848, a year that was racked with revolutions across Europe and during which Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels published the Communist Manifesto when “a spectre [was] haunting Europe.”

[†] Barfly (1906) is a habitual patron of a drinking establishment. Bitcoin (2008) is a form of cryptocurrency.

To Oxford or Not to Oxford? That is the question.

13 February 2022

Meme claiming the sentence After beating the Steelers, Tim Tebow thanked his parents, God and Ms. Trunchbull is confusing

Meme claiming the sentence After beating the Steelers, Tim Tebow thanked his parents, God and Ms. Trunchbull is confusing

A bunch of comments about the use, or lack thereof, of the Oxford comma have been appearing in my Twitter feed as of late, so I thought I’d put my thoughts on the subject here, rather than responding to a multitude of threads.

First, let me state for the record that I prefer to use the Oxford comma. I use it in my writing.

That said, unless I’m working as a copy editor where the house style is to use it, I do not insist that others do so. And I never think that someone who opts not to use it is a lesser writer. That is because whether or not use the Oxford comma is a style choice. Ultimately, it makes no difference.

For those who are uninitiated into the sacred rites of punctuation, the Oxford, or serial, comma is the comma that appears before the final item in a list. Example: the phrase bacon, ham, and eggs uses the Oxford comma; the phrase bacon, ham and eggs does not. It is called the Oxford comma because the house style of Oxford University Press is to use it. Most of the publishers in Britain do not call for its use (which is why Oxford is singled out); while most of those in the United States do call for its use in the material they publish.

For those who insist on its use, as well as for those who insist it not be used, should take note of this last fact. The vast majority of people in Britain and United States get along just fine without a single, hard-and-fast rule. If it truly made a difference, there would be a unified rule.

That said, there are individual instances where the use or lack thereof of the Oxford comma can create confusion. Hardcore advocates love to point these out, but most of the examples they choose to highlight are not really confusing. The instances where genuine confusion can arise are rare.

Meme claiming the sentence I had eggs, toast and orange juice is confusing

Meme claiming the sentence I had eggs, toast and orange juice is confusing

One meme that has circulated claimed that the following sentence is confusing:

After beating the Steelers, Tim Tebow thanked his parents, God and Ms. Trunchbull.

The problem with this example is that absolutely no one would seriously entertain the idea that Tim Tebow was the offspring of the supreme deity and Ms. Trunchbull. There is nothing confusing about this sentence.

Another even more absurd example is a meme that claims the following sentence is confusing:

I had eggs, toast and orange juice.

The meme says that this sentence is a claim about eating eggs that is addressed to toast and orange juice. Again, the idea that a person would be speaking to breakfast food is silly. There is nothing confusing about this sentence.

A somewhat more astute example can be seen in a meme that claims that the following phrase is confusing:

the US president, a racist and a misogynist

Meme stating that the phrase the US president, a racist and misogynist refer is confusing

Meme stating that the phrase the US president, a racist and misogynist refer is confusing

If one is referring to Jimmy Carter or Barack Obama, there is no confusion. No serious person is going to label either of these men as racist or misogynist; the sentence refers to three people. But if the president in question is, say, Woodrow Wilson or Donald Trump, then a reader may legitimately be confused as to what is meant. But note, the confusion results whether or not the Oxford comma is used. Using an Oxford comma in no way guarantees clarity of expression.

The confusion results not because of the present or absence of a comma but because a comma is too weak to support the weight of the meaning. The sentence needs to be recast to take the semantic weight off the comma.

A more mundane, and probably more likely, example is the following pair of sentences:

Alice, Betty’s grandmother and Charles attended the wedding.

Alice, Betty’s grandmother, and Charles attended the wedding.

Both of these sentences can be confusing if one does not know the relationship between Alice and Betty. There is no confusion if one knows whether or not Alice is Betty’s grandmother. What is missing here is context, specifically who the intended reader is. If one is writing to someone who knows Alice and Betty, then the sentence is perfectly clear. If not, then the sentence or passage needs to be rewritten to make the relationship clear.

Go ahead and use the Oxford comma or not, whichever is your preference. Ideally, you should be consistent in your style choice, but consistency is no guarantee of clarity. You can’t expect your readers to remember whether or not your practice is to use the Oxford comma. Unless you’re writing the next Finnegans Wake, it’s your job as writer to make things clear for your readers.

And whichever style you chose, do not admonish others for making a different choice. It’s wrong, pedantic and annoying.

Discuss this post

American Dialect Society 2021 Word of the Year

9 January 2022

On Friday, the American Dialect Society selected insurrection as its Word of the Year for 2021, winning out over the combining form vax/vaxx in a runoff. The ADS has been selecting words of the year for 32 years, making it the longest running of these endeavors. The ADS is made up of linguists, lexicographers, editors, and others who study language either professionally or as serious amateurs. But despite the organization’s professional orientation, the WOTY is open to the public and is undertaken in a spirit of fun. The ADS does not claim that this is any kind of scholarly endeavor.

For the second year in a row, the WOTY selection was conducted online, and over three hundred people actively participated via Zoom. The day prior to the public meeting, a smaller, invited group of about fifty met online to nominate words in the various categories. Nominations “from the floor” were also accepted in the public meeting. I participated in both meetings. The full list of nominees and vote totals is in the ADS press release. You can also watch a recording of the proceedings on YouTube.

Other organizations take a more data-driven approach to their WOTY selections. For instance, both Merriam-Webster and Oxford University Press base their selection on the word that received the greatest spike in lookups on their online dictionaries, after filtering out the “evergreen” words that are looked up year after year. Both of these dictionaries selected variations on vaccine as their WOTY, vaccine for Merriam-Webster and vax for Oxford. My own take on WOTY 2021 is here.

I’m not going to give a comprehensive run-down of the ADS selections as I’ve done in past years. You can read the ADS press release for that. Instead, I’m offering some observations on the process and the choices.

When ADS kicked off the WOTY phenomenon over thirty years ago, it was intended as a fun exercise that might generate some publicity for the organization. As to the latter, it has succeeded beyond all expectations of that original group. It was never intended as a scholarly exercise, and that needs to be kept in mind. The ADS process is highly subjective, reflecting the tastes, biases, and agendas of the participants.

This year, I paid attention to the chat that was happening in Zoom alongside the audio/video feed. For the first time, I got a glimpse into what a large number of the participants were thinking. Very few were thinking as linguists, as professional scholars of language. That’s an observation, not a criticism. The process isn’t one of scholarly rigor, so why should people pretend that it is? Besides, it was clear that everyone was having a lot of fun. (The discussion of glizzy gobbling had me literally laughing out loud.)

For instance, one person said that while CRT/critical race theory was clearly an important term, they wouldn’t be voting for it as political term of the year because they didn’t want to highlight yet again the racist appropriation of the term. That’s an opinion I share and support, but it’s an opinion based on political rather than linguistic factors. CRT did not win, not even making it into the runoff. The winner in that category was insurrection in a runoff with Big Lie. Both of these are better choices on both political and linguistic grounds.

Another voiced the opinion that they were voting for variant because the experience with COVID-19 variants made it easier for them to explain the concept of linguistic variation to their students. I’m not sure how the imprimatur of the ADS would make the teaching any easier, but okay, that’s as good a reason as any.

Another surprise to me was the groundswell of support for Great Resignation and antiwork. While I was aware of the growing opposition to exploitative labor practices, I did not expect so much vocal support for these terms. I was unfamiliar with antiwork as a term (but not as a concept) before Friday, and it was nominated for WOTY “from the floor.” It probably shouldn’t have been a surprise though. ADS, like many organizations made up of university professors and grad students, skews more liberal than the population as a whole, plus many of those participating were younger than me.

But as an old fart, the biggest shock was the informal (in past years slang) category. I had never heard of any of the nominees. I guess I’m just cheugy.

Another new term to me was hard pants, but I fully support it. It’s simultaneously useful and silly. Ditto for copium, useful and playful.

There were no separate hashtag or emoji categories this year, another good change. I don’t object to hashtags or emojis. To the contrary, I like seeing them in contention as regular “words.” No emojis were nominated this year, but #FreeBritney won the digital word category, a worthy win.

I had my own biases and blind spots, and I’m sure every other participant had the same. I guess my point is that the WOTY should be taken as a bit of fun and a launching point for discussion of the past year and the vocabulary it generated and not as a serious pronouncement by experts from on high.

Discuss this post

2021 Wordorigins.org Words of the Year

27 December 2021

2021

As in past years, I’ve come up with a list of words of the year. I do things a bit differently in that I don’t try to select one term to represent the entire year. Instead, I select twelve terms, one for each month.

Discuss this post

The crowd storming the US Capitol on 6 January 2021

January: insurrection: The crowd storming the US Capitol on 6 January 2021

January: insurrection. Egged on by President Trump, a mob stormed the US Capitol as the presidential electoral votes were being counted in an attempt to keep Trump in power. Its reverberations were felt throughout all of 2021.

A researcher in mask and gloves holding up a vial of COVID-19 vaccine

February: jab: a researcher in mask and gloves holding up a vial of COVID-19 vaccine

February: jab. The Covid-19 vaccines started to become widely available in February 2021, and jab had a brief moment in the sun.

A crowd of protesters, with an Asian woman in the foreground holding a placard that reads, “Stop the Hate. We are not your scapegoat.”

March: hate crime: a crowd of protesters, with an Asian woman in the foreground holding a placard that reads, “Stop the Hate. We are not your scapegoat.”

March-1: hate crime. I cheated a bit and chose two terms for March. On 16 March, a gunman engaged in a shooting spree in Atlanta killing eight, including six Asian women, and injuring one other.

Satellite image of the Ever Given, a large container ship, run aground and blocking the Suez Canal

March: Ever Given: satellite image of the Ever Given, a large container ship, run aground and blocking the Suez Canal

March-2: Ever Given. On 23 March, the container ship Ever Given ran aground in and blocked the Suez Canal for a week, disrupting worldwide shipping traffic.

A crowd of Black Lives Matter protestors demonstrating for justice for George Floyd

April: accountability: a crowd of Black Lives Matter protestors demonstrating for justice for George Floyd

April: accountability. On 20 April, the Minneapolis, the Minnesota police officer who suffocated George Floyd was convicted of murder.

Gasoline pumps with “out of service” signs due to lack of fuel

May: ransomware: gasoline pumps with “out of service” signs due to lack of fuel

May: ransomware. On 7 May, the Colonial Pipeline suffered a ransomware cyberattack, shutting down the pipeline until a payment of some $4.4 million was made and causing fuel shortages in southeast US.

Undated photo (1940s?) of Indigenous children and nuns posed in front of a Canadian residential school building

June: residential school: Undated photo (1940s?) of Indigenous children and nuns posed in front of a Canadian residential school building

June: residential school. On May 27, 215 unmarked graves of Indigenous children were found at the Kamloops Indian Residential School in British Columbia. By the end of June, an additional 943 unmarked graves had been found at other residential schools in Canada.

A SpaceX rocket blasting off from its launch pad

July: billionaire: a SpaceX rocket blasting off from its launch pad

July: billionaire. In July, billionaires Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson displayed their enormous wealth and diminutive genitalia by rocketing into space on board spacecraft belonging to their companies Blue Origin and Virgin Galactic.

night-vision image of Major General Chris Donahue, the last US soldier to leave Afghanistan, stepping onto a C-17 transport plane

August: Taliban: night-vision image of Major General Chris Donahue, the last US soldier to leave Afghanistan, stepping onto a C-17 transport plane

August: Taliban. On 30 August as the last the last US troops left Afghanistan, the US’s longest war ended with a Taliban victory.

Protestors in front of the Texas capitol builidng demonstrating against Texas Senate Bill 8 which, in effect, outlawed abortion in Texas

September: SB 8: protestors in front of the Texas capitol builidng demonstrating against Texas Senate Bill 8 which, in effect, outlawed abortion in Texas

September: SB 8. Texas Senate Bill 8 went into effect and effectively outlawed abortion in the state of Texas. It also created a “vigilante” right to sue, allowing the law to avoid scrutiny by the federal courts.

Stacks of shipping containers at Port Elizabeth, New Jersey

October: supply chain: stacks of shipping containers at Port Elizabeth, New Jersey

October: supply chain. The pandemic created a perfect storm of decreased manufacturing, delays in shipping, and increased demand by people stuck at home for nearly two years, resulting in empty store shelves and containers of goods piling up in ports.

Vials of Covid-19 vaccine

November: booster: vials of Covid-19 vaccine

November: booster. The United States authorized a third booster dose of the Covid vaccine for all adults in November.

Graph showing the variants of the Covid-19 virus, from alpha through omicron

December: omicron: graph showing the variants of the Covid-19 virus, from alpha through omicron

December: omicron. We may be through with Covid, but Covid isn’t through with us.

A faux-product called “I Can’t Believe He Got Buttered” featuring an orange cat licking its lips

Postscript: buttered Jorts: a faux-product called “I Can’t Believe He Got Buttered” featuring an orange cat licking its lips

Postscript: buttered Jorts. I recognize that this list is mostly a downer, but December has seen the tale of Jorts the Cat and how he got “buttered” take over the internet. So, let’s end on a fun and silly note.

Discuss this post


Image credits:

2021: Freepik.com. Permitted use with attribution.

January: TapTheForwardAssist, 2021. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

February: US Department of Defense, 2020. Public domain image.

March (hate crime): Becker1999, 2021. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

March (Ever Given): Pierre Markuse, 2021, contains modified Copernicus Sentinel data. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license.

April: Guettarda, 2020. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

May: Famartin, 2021. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

June: Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre.

July: NASA, 2020. Public domain image.

August: US Department of Defense, 2021. Public domain image.

September: Jno.skinner, 2021. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

October: NOAA, 2004. Public domain image.

November: USAF, 2021. Public domain image.

December: Stuart Ray, 2021. Used under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

Postscript: R. deValmont, 2021.

A Note on Toponyms

28 April 2021

The origins of toponyms, or place names, are a tricky category to research. All too often, the origins are obscured or mixed up with local folklore and unverified facts. Some are easy—any North American toponym that beings with New usually has an obvious proximate origin, although the European toponym it’s based on may have an uncertain origin. For instance, we know that New Jersey is named after the Channel Island, but we only have a reasonable guess as to where the Channel Island gets its name—we’re pretty sure it’s from an Old Norse personal name, Geirr’s ey (Geirr’s Island), but we don’t know that for certain. Other names, especially those of Native American origin, are often highly questionable. European mangling of the indigenous names often renders the origin unrecognizable, and when we can identify the language and word it comes from, often the literal meaning of that indigenous word is uncertain because knowledge of that language has atrophied as a result of there being too few speakers left.

To properly research any one toponym often requires intensive archival research in state, provincial, and local historical archives and expertise in a Native American language. Because I don’t have the resources to invest weeks of work on a single place name, much less expertise in dozens of Native American languages, on this site I generally rely on published toponymic dictionaries. While the ones I use are well researched, the editors of these dictionaries have the same resource constraints that I do. And, because the nature of dictionaries is that the entries need to be brief, often warnings about the tentative nature of the findings are stripped out. This is a problem with secondary sources in general, not just toponyms; as information is repeated and cited, caveats and hedges fall away and what was originally speculation or weakly supported becomes framed as iron-clad fact.

In short, take any origins of place names with grain of salt unless they are accompanied with a chain of citations to supporting evidence.

Discuss this post